Rachel Reeves Mansion House Speech – Invest, not save? What it means for your money…..

If you were expecting fireworks from Rachel Reeves’ Mansion House speech on Tuesday night, you might have been left slightly underwhelmed.

In a way, that was the point – and perhaps, a welcome one. After weeks of political noise, the Chancellor’s tone was more “steady hand” than “revolutionary shake-up”.

Ahead of the speech, much of the chatter centred on potential reforms to ISAs – especially rumours that the cash ISA limit might be cut to nudge more savers into stocks and shares. That idea sparked swift backlash from building societies and high-profile consumer voices like Martin Lewis. Unsurprisingly, it didn’t make the final cut.

That said, this particular debate isn’t over. Reeves made it clear she’s not done with ISA reform, saying she plans to consult further over the coming months. The goal? To cultivate a stronger investment culture in the UK – a recurring theme in what was otherwise a cautious speech.

 

The Numbers Tell a Story

As part of the government’s new “Leeds Reforms” (yes, really), Reeves reminded us of a familiar problem: too many of us are sitting on too much cash. According to estimates, over 29 million adults in the United Kingdom have money languishing in low-interest accounts. At current rates (around 1.5%), that’s well below inflation.

Compare that to the average stock market return of around 9% over the past decade, and the difference is stark. Reeves gave an illustrative example: £2,000 invested today could grow to £12,000 over 20 years in equities, versus just £2,700 in cash. That’s a potential £9,000 gap – enough to turn heads.

Of course, markets don’t always behave so obligingly, and savers can get more than 1.5% on cash if they’re willing to shop around. But the government’s argument remains solid: for long-term goals, equities have historically offered far better returns than savings accounts.

 

Changing the Narrative Around Risk

Reeves struck a chord when she addressed how risk is often framed. “We’ve been too quick to warn people of the dangers of investing, without balancing that against the long-term benefits,” she said. It’s a fair point. The industry’s cautious messaging has often tilted too far in one direction – especially when you consider how inflation can quietly ravage the real value of cash over time.

To help change perceptions, the government plans to roll out a national campaign in 2026 to promote retail investing – an echo of the famous “Tell Sid” adverts from the privatisation era. The idea is to get more people comfortable with the idea of investing, especially those who might currently be frozen out by fear or misinformation.

 

Some Movement on ISAs – But No Revolution (Yet)

While headline-grabbing reforms were thin on the ground, there were a few technical tweaks worth noting.

From April 2026, long-term asset funds (LTAFs) will be permitted within stocks and shares ISAs. These funds offer exposure to less liquid investments – think infrastructure or private equity – and are designed with long-term savers in mind. The government hopes this shift will help channel more capital into areas that support the UK economy, while offering the potential for better returns.

It’s a measured but meaningful step, especially when paired with the government’s broader ambition to simplify the ISA landscape. Right now, there are six types of ISAs, which is arguably five too many. A streamlined, more intuitive system would be welcomed by investors and advisers alike.

 

Support Without the Strings of Full Advice

Also from 2026, a new FCA-led initiative called “Targeted Support” will allow banks and providers to guide customers with tailored nudges – such as flagging when a client’s money is sitting idle in low-yielding accounts. It’s a half-step between general guidance and regulated advice, designed to address the gap for those who don’t – or can’t – seek full financial planning.

This is a pragmatic solution to a widespread problem. Just 9% of UK adults accessed financial advice in the past year, with many instead turning to social media or informal sources. That’s a risky trend, especially as personal finance decisions become increasingly complex.

 

And What About Pensions?

Despite some pre-speech speculation, there were no major announcements on pensions – just a reiteration of the Mansion House Accord, where large pension schemes have pledged to invest more in private markets.

Still, the bigger question remains: are current pension contribution levels enough to deliver a decent retirement? Most experts would say no. But with employers already under pressure from rising taxes and wage costs, pushing for higher contributions right now would be politically and economically tricky.

The self-employed – a group often left out of pension reform conversations – also got no mention. That’s disappointing considering how underserved they are when it comes to long-term savings options.

What Next?

While the Mansion House speech was light on drama, it laid the groundwork for more meaningful reforms at the Autumn Budget. There’s clear intent to reshape ISAs, improve investment access, and modernise how financial guidance is delivered.

The message to private investors? Don’t expect sweeping change overnight – but do pay attention. With inflation still a concern and cash offering limited upside, the case for long-term investing is only getting stronger.

 

Dan Dowding

Director of Wealth Management

Next
Next

Budget 2024: Key Points